Claim

0

The launch system can safely abort at any point during the launch

Abort

Evidence

In the abort scenarios considered here, the assumed failure is an unexpected loss of forward acceleration. It is assumed that the adaptive nut and launch sled will remain magnetically coupled to the guideway, so the vehicle continues to be supported and guided by the guideway even though it is no longer being accelerated.

As with rocket aborts, the appropriate abort response depends primarily on the vehicle speed at the time acceleration is lost. The system therefore has multiple abort regimes, each corresponding to a different range of vehicle kinetic energy, atmospheric heating risk, and stopping distance.

In the first abort regime, acceleration fails while the vehicle is still traveling at relatively low speed. In this case, the launch train uses its eddy current brakes to decelerate within the horizontal acceleration section or on the ramp. The vehicle never reaches the elevated evacuated tube. The abort is therefore mechanically straightforward: the launch train is brought to a controlled stop, the vehicle remains within the guideway system, and the launcher can be reset with relatively limited recovery operations.

In the second abort regime, acceleration fails after the vehicle has reached a speed at which it can no longer be stopped before entering the elevated evacuated tube, but before it has reached a speed at which atmospheric exit at the end of the ramp would cause destructive aerodynamic heating. In this case, the system transitions to an atmospheric-release abort. An abort burst disk is inserted at the ramp exit, sealing the end of the evacuated ramp section. An airtight door at the beginning of the elevated evacuated tube is closed, allowing the elevated evacuated tube to separate from the ramp and move away from the projected vehicle path. The vehicle then exits the ramp through the burst disk and enters the atmosphere. A fast-closing door farther down the ramp closes after vehicle passage to prevent loss of vacuum from the remainder of the launch tube. If appropriate, the spacecraft may ignite its onboard rocket propulsion system to offset aerodynamic drag, and transition to a survivable powered abort trajectory.

In the third abort regime, acceleration fails after the vehicle has reached a speed at which immediate atmospheric release would expose it to excessive heating or structural loads. In this regime, the elevated evacuated tube remains attached to the ramp so that it can protect the vehicle from denser atmosphere. Rather than separating from the ramp, the elevated evacuated tube separates at a selected downstream separation point. The lower portion of the elevated evacuated tube, between the ramp and the separation point, adjusts its position to follow the vehicle’s revised ballistic path, which will be lower than the nominal launch trajectory because acceleration has ceased. The upper portion of the elevated evacuated tube moves upward away from the revised vehicle path, maximizing clearance between the aborted vehicle and the remaining tube structure.

At each of the preselected separation points, the elevated evacuated tube below the separation point is fitted with an exit airlock system. An exit airlock comprises a fast-closing door positioned some distance from the end of the tube and and a burst disk at the very end. The burst disk slides into place to seal the end of the tube if and when EET separation is required.

If an abort requiring separation occurs, the EET will separate, the lower portion will conform to the revised flight path, and the vehicle will pass through the burst disk and exits into the atmosphere at a safe altitude for its speed. Meanwhile, the fast-closing door closes behind the spacecraft to prevent a full loss of vacuum in the remaining protected tube volume.

The elevated evacuated tube includes multiple possible separation points, allowing the system to select the abort geometry best matched to the vehicle’s speed and expected trajectory at the time of failure.

The separated upper section of the elevated evacuated tube remains electrically connected to the ground-supported portion by flexible power transmission lines, allowing its lift fans and control systems to remain powered during the abort maneuver. In some abort cases, the upper section may also open valves to admit air, increasing its internal pressure so that it can better withstand shock waves generated by the aborted vehicle passing below it. This measure is intended to help prevent a collapse of the separated tube section triggered by the transient external pressure load of shock waves emanated by the spacecraft.

Once clear of the system, the spacecraft can follow a sub-orbital trajectory and land propulsively the way it would on Mars, or, if it's travelling faster, abort into orbit. If acceleration fails very late in the launch, such that the spacecraft has insufficient speed to complete the mission but too much to abort to orbit with the nominal amount of rocket thrust during endoatmospheric transit, abort to orbit can still be achieved by thrusting less with the rocket, allowing atmospheric drag to bleed off excess velocity.

Together, these abort regimes allow the launch system to respond continuously across the full range of launch speeds. At low speeds, the vehicle is stopped inside the launcher. At intermediate speeds, it is released into the atmosphere before heating becomes destructive. At high speeds, the elevated evacuated tube continues to protect the vehicle until a later, speed-appropriate exit point is reached. The result is not a single abort mode, but a speed-dependent abort architecture that preserves vehicle guidance, protects the launcher vacuum system, and maintains a survivable path for the spacecraft throughout the launch.

Reviews

The following reviews are limited in scope to the validity of the claim made above, and do not imply that the reviewer has taken a position regarding any other claim or the overall feasibility of a concept that is supported by this claim.

No reviews yet.